Language:中  文  English

Chapter 2 - Immigrant Petition Eligibility Requirements

Content navigation tabs

The immigrant investor category requires three main elements:

Each element is explained in this chapter in the context of:

For the general requirements, the term immigrant investor in this part of the Policy Manual refers to any employment-based 5th preference (EB-5) investor-petitioner, whether investing through the standalone program or the Regional Center Program. Where distinctions between the two programs exist, the term standalone immigrant investor refers to petitioners using the standalone program, and the term regional center immigrant investor refers to petitioners using the Regional Center Program.

A. Investment of Capital

Congress created the immigrant investor category so the U.S. economy can benefit from an immigrant’s contribution of capital. This benefit is greatest when capital is at risk and invested in a new commercial enterprise that, because of the investment, creates at least 10 full-time jobs for U.S. workers. The regulations that govern the category define the terms capital and investment with this economic benefit in mind.[2]

1. Capital

The word capital does not mean only cash. Instead, the broad definition of capital takes into account the many different ways in which a person can make a contribution of financial value to a business.

The following table outlines how the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 refined the definition of capital.

Definition of Capital
For petitions filed before March 15, 2022 For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022[3]
Capital includes cash, equipment, inventory, other tangible property, cash equivalents, and indebtedness secured by assets owned by the immigrant investor, provided the immigrant investor is personally and primarily liable and that the assets of the new commercial enterprise upon which the petition is based are not used to secure any of the indebtedness.[4] All capital must be valued at fair market value in U.S. dollars. Congress has similarly defined “capital” as “cash and all real, personal, or mixed tangible assets owned and controlled by the . . . investor, or held in trust for the benefit of the [investor] and to which the [investor] has unrestricted access.”[5] Also consistent with past definitions, the statute now provides that capital must be valued at fair market value in U.S. dollars, in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or other standard accounting practice adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, at the time it is invested.[6]

The immigrant investor must establish that they are the legal owner of the capital invested[7] and has obtained the capital through lawful means. USCIS does not consider as capital any assets acquired directly or indirectly by unlawful means, such as criminal activity.[8] As of May 14, 2022, gifts and loans to the investor are expressly permitted as capital, provided certain conditions are met.[9]

Promissory Notes

Capital can include the immigrant investor’s promise to pay (a promissory note), as long as the immigrant investor is personally and primarily liable for the promissory note debt and his or her assets adequately secure the note. Any security interest must be perfected[10] to the extent provided for by the jurisdiction in which the asset is located.[11] Further, the assets securing the promissory note:

The fair market value of a promissory note depends on its present value, not the value at any different time. In addition, to qualify as capital, nearly all of the money due under a promissory note must be payable within 2 years, without provisions for extensions.[13]

Investing Indebtedness

When investing indebtedness, an immigrant investor must demonstrate:

The immigrant investor must have primary responsibility, under the loan documents, for repaying the debt used to satisfy his or her minimum required investment amount.[14]

The immigrant investor must also demonstrate that his or her own collateral secures the indebtedness, and that the value of the collateral is sufficient to secure the amount of indebtedness that satisfies the immigrant investor’s minimum required investment amount. Any indebtedness secured by the immigrant investor’s assets qualifies as capital only up to the fair market value of the immigrant investor’s pledged assets.

2. Investment

The immigrant investor is required to invest his or her own capital. The petitioner must document the path of the funds to establish that the investment was made, or is actively in the process of being made, with the immigrant investor’s own funds.[15] For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, the capital must be expected to remain invested for not less than 2 years.[16]

To invest means to contribute capital. A loan from the immigrant investor to the new commercial enterprise does not count as a contribution of capital. A contribution of capital in exchange for a note, bond, convertible debt, obligation, or any other debt arrangement between the immigrant investor and the new commercial enterprise is not a capital investment.[17]

To qualify as an investment, the immigrant investor must actually place his or her capital at risk. The mere intent to invest is not sufficient.[18]

Purchasing a share of a business from an existing shareholder, without more, does not qualify, since the payment goes to the former shareholder rather than to the new commercial enterprise.

Guaranteed Returns

If the immigrant investor is guaranteed a return, or a rate of return, on all or a portion of their capital, then the amount of any guaranteed return is not at risk.[19] For the capital to be at risk, there must be a risk of loss and a chance for gain.

Additionally, if the investor is guaranteed the right to eventual ownership or use of a particular asset in consideration of the investor’s contribution of capital into the new commercial enterprise, the expected present value of the guaranteed ownership or use of such asset counts against the total amount of the investor’s capital contribution in determining how much money was placed at risk. For example, if the immigrant investor is given a right of ownership or use of real estate, the present value of that real estate is not counted as investment capital put at risk of loss.[20]

Nothing prevents an immigrant investor from receiving a return on his or her capital in the form of a distribution of profits from the new commercial enterprise. This distribution of profits may happen during the conditional residency period and may happen before creating the required jobs. However, the distribution cannot be a portion of the investor’s minimum qualifying investment and cannot have been guaranteed to the investor.

Redemption Language for Petitions Filed Before March 15, 2022

USCIS relies on regulatory language and precedent decisions to address redemption agreements. The regulatory definition of “invest” excludes capital contributions that are “in exchange for a note, bond, convertible debt, obligation, or any other debt arrangement.”[21]

An agreement evidencing a preconceived intent to exit the investment as soon as possible after removing conditions on permanent residence may constitute an impermissible debt arrangement. [22] Funds contributed in exchange for a debt arrangement do not constitute a qualifying contribution of capital.[23] In general, the petitioner may not enter into the agreement knowing that he or she has a willing buyer at a certain time and for a certain price.[24]

Any agreement between the immigrant investor and the new commercial enterprise that provides the investor with a contractual right to repayment is an impermissible debt arrangement. In such a case, the investment funds do not constitute a qualifying contribution of capital.[25] Mandatory redemptions and options exercisable by the investor are two examples of agreements where the investor has a right to repayment. The impermissibility of such an arrangement cannot be remedied with the addition of other requirements or contingencies, such as conditioning the repurchase of the securities on the availability of funds; the delay of the repurchase until a date in the future (including after the adjudication of the Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status (Form I-829)); or the possibility that the investor might not exercise the right. In other words, repayment does not need to be guaranteed in order to be impermissible. It is the establishment of the investor’s right to demand a repurchase, regardless of the new commercial enterprise’s ability to fulfill the repurchase, that constitutes an impermissible debt arrangement.[26]

The following table describes certain characteristics that might be present in agreements and explains whether their inclusion creates an impermissible debt arrangement.

Characteristics of Redemption Provisions
Type of Provision Description Impermissible Agreement?
Mandatory redemptions Arrangements that require the new commercial enterprise to redeem all or a portion of the petitioner’s equity at a specified time or upon the occurrence of a specified event (for example, once the conditions are removed on the petitioner’s permanent resident status) and for a specified price (whether fixed or subject to a specified formula). USCIS considers this an impermissible debt arrangement. Such impermissible obligations are not subject to the discretion of the new commercial enterprise (although it may have some discretion regarding the timing and manner in which the redemption is performed).
Options exercisable by the investor Arrangements that grant the petitioner the option to require the new commercial enterprise to redeem all or a portion of his or her equity at a specified time or upon the occurrence of a specified event (for example, once the conditions are removed on the petitioner’s permanent resident status) and for a specified price (whether fixed or subject to a specified formula). USCIS considers this an impermissible debt arrangement.
Option exercisable by the new commercial enterprise

A redemption agreement between the immigrant investor and the new commercial enterprise that does not provide the investor with a right to repayment.

One example of such an agreement is a discretionary option held by the new commercial enterprise to repurchase investor shares. These options are typically structured similarly to options exercisable by the investor, except that the option is held and may be exercised by the new commercial enterprise. When executed, these options require an investor to sell all or a portion of his or her ownership interest back to that entity.

USCIS generally does not consider these arrangements to be impermissible debt arrangements.[27]

However, such an option may be impermissible if there is evidence the parties construct it in a manner that effectively converts it to a mandatory redemption or an option exercisable by the investor (considered a debt arrangement). For example, an arrangement would be impermissible if ancillary provisions or agreements obligate the new commercial enterprise to either (a) exercise the option (at a specified time, upon the occurrence of a specified event, or at the request of the investor) or (b) if it chooses not to exercise the option, liquidate the assets and refund the investor a specific amount.

Redemption Language for Petitions Filed on or after March 15, 2022

On March 15, 2022, Congress enacted specific statutory provisions relating to agreements between the immigrant investor and the new commercial enterprise. For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, capital does not include:

However, the new statutory definition of capital includes (in other words, does not prohibit) capital invested that:

Business Activity

An immigrant investor must provide evidence of the actual undertaking of business activity. Merely establishing and capitalizing a new commercial enterprise and signing a commercial lease are not sufficient to show that an immigrant investor has placed his or her capital at risk.[30] Without some evidence of business activity, no assurance exists that the funds will be used to carry out the business of the commercial enterprise.[31]

Made Available

The full amount of the investment must be made available to the business​(​es​)​ most closely responsible for creating the employment upon which the petition is base​d​.[32] ​In the regional center context, the immigrant investor must establish that the capital was ​invested into the new commercial enterprise and ​that the full amount ​was subsequently made available to the job-creating business(es), if separate.​ ​

In cases with a separate job-creating entity or entities, ​the payment of ​​administrative fees, management fees, attorneys’ fees, finders’ fees, syndication fees, ​and​ other types of expenses or costs ​by ​the new commercial enterprise ​that erode the amount of capital ​made available to the job​-​creating entity ​do not count toward the minimum required investment amount.[33] The payment of these fees​ and expenses​ ​must ​be in addition to the ​minimum required​ capital investment​ amount​.

Sole Proprietors and Funds in Bank Accounts

A standalone investor who is operating a new commercial enterprise as a sole proprietor cannot consider funds in his or her personal bank account as capital committed to the new commercial enterprise. Funds in a personal bank account are not necessarily committed to the new commercial enterprise. The funds must be in business bank accounts.[34] However, even a deposit into a business account over which petitioner exercises sole control, without more, may not satisfy the at-risk requirement.[35]

Escrow Accounts

An immigrant investor’s money may be held in escrow until the investor has obtained conditional permanent resident status if the immediate and irrevocable release of the escrowed funds is contingent only upon:

An immigrant investor’s funds may be held in escrow within the United States to avoid any evidentiary issues that may arise with respect to issues such as significant currency fluctuations[36] and foreign capital export restrictions.

Use of foreign escrow accounts is not prohibited as long as the petition establishes that it is more likely than not that the minimum qualifying capital investment will be transferred to the new commercial enterprise in the United States upon the investor obtaining conditional permanent resident status.

When adjudicating the immigrant investor’s petition to remove conditions,[37] USCIS requires evidence verifying that the escrowed funds were released and that the investment was sustained in the new commercial enterprise for the period of the immigrant investor’s residence in the United States.

Deployment of Capital

Before the job creation requirement is met, a new commercial enterprise may deploy capital directly or through any financial instrument so long as applicable requirements are satisfied, including the following:

The purchase of financial instruments traded on secondary markets generally does not satisfy these requirements because such secondary market purchases generally:

Further Deployment After the Job Creation Requirement is Satisfied

Once the job creation requirement has been met and the investment capital is returned or otherwise available to the new commercial enterprise, the new commercial enterprise may further deploy such capital within a reasonable amount of time[40] in order to satisfy applicable requirements for continued eligibility.[41] The capital may be further deployed, as described above, into any commercial activity that is consistent with the purpose of the new commercial enterprise to engage in the “ongoing conduct of lawful business,”[42] including as may be evidenced in any amendments to the offering documents made to describe the further deployment into such activities.[43]

Consistent with precedent case decisions and existing regulatory requirements, further deployment must continue to meet all applicable eligibility requirements within the framework of the initial bases of eligibility,[44] including the same new commercial enterprise.[45] The further deployment does not need to remain with the same (or any) job creating entity or in a targeted employment area (TEA).

For example, if a new commercial enterprise associated with a regional center loaned pooled investment capital to a job-creating entity that created sufficient jobs through the construction of a residential building in a TEA, the new commercial enterprise, upon repayment of the loan that resulted in the required job creation, may generally further deploy the repaid capital anywhere in the United States or its territories (regardless of whether it would qualify as a TEA) into any commercial activity that satisfies applicable requirements such as one or more similar loans to other entities.

For regional center petitions filed on or after May 14, 2022, further deployment is permitted under the following conditions:

3. Required Amount of Investment

The immigrant investor must invest at least the standard minimum investment amount in capital in a new commercial enterprise that creates no fewer than 10 jobs for U.S. workers. An exception exists if the immigrant investor invests their capital in a new commercial enterprise that is principally doing business in and creates jobs in a TEA or, for regional center petitions filed on or after May 14, 2022, in an infrastructure project.

This means that the present fair market value, in U.S. dollars, of the immigrant investor’s lawfully-derived capital must be at least $1,000,000, or $500,000 if investing in a TEA for petitions filed before March 15, 2022.[48] For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, those amounts are $1,050,000 or $800,000 if investing in a TEA or infrastructure project, and will automatically increase January 1, 2027, and every 5 years thereafter.[49]

Immigrant investors may diversify their investment across a portfolio of businesses or projects, but only if the minimum investment amount is first placed in a single new commercial enterprise. In such a case, it is necessary to show how eligibility has been established (for example, the minimum investment amount, evidence of an at-risk investment,[50] and job creation) with respect to each job-creating entity at the time of filing.

For standalone investors, the capital may be deployed into a portfolio of wholly owned businesses, so long as all capital is deployed through a single commercial enterprise comprised of a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiaries and all jobs are created directly within that commercial enterprise (in other words, through the portfolio of wholly owned subsidiaries that received the capital through the holding company).

For example, for a petition filed before March 15, 2022, based on an investment in an area in which the minimum investment amount is $1,000,000, the standalone investor can satisfy the statute by investing in a holding company that deploys $600,000 of the investment toward one subsidiary that the holding company wholly owns, and $400,000 of the investment toward another subsidiary that the holding company wholly owns.[51] In this example, the two wholly owned subsidiaries would have to create an aggregate of 10 new jobs between them. However, a standalone investor cannot qualify by separately investing $600,000 in one commercial enterprise and $400,000 in a different commercial enterprise, since these enterprises would be separate rather than consisting of a singular commercial enterprise comprised of a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiaries.

In the regional center context, where indirect jobs may be counted, the commercial enterprise may create jobs indirectly through multiple investments in corporate affiliates or in unrelated entities, but the regional center investor cannot qualify by investing directly in those multiple entities. Instead, the regional center investor’s capital must still be invested in a single commercial enterprise, which can then deploy that capital to multiple job-creating entities as long as the portfolio of businesses or projects can create the required number of jobs.

4. Lawful Source of Funds

For Petitions Filed before May 14, 2022[52]

The immigrant investor must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the capital invested, or actively in the process of being invested, in the new commercial enterprise was obtained through lawful means.[53] Any assets acquired directly or indirectly by unlawful means, such as criminal activity, are not considered capital.[54] In establishing that the capital was acquired through lawful means, the immigrant investor must provide evidence demonstrating the direct and indirect source of his or her investment capital.[55]

As evidence of the lawful source of funds, the immigrant investor’s petition must be accompanied, as applicable, by:

The immigrant investor is required to submit evidence identifying any other source of capital. Such evidence may include:

For Petitions Filed on or after May 14, 2022[58]

Effective on May 14, 2022, the immigrant investor must submit the following evidence, as applicable, to demonstrate the lawful source of the invested funds and any funds used to pay administrative costs and fees:

As of May 14, 2022, by statute, gifts and borrowed funds are expressly permissible for petitions filed on or after that date, provided:

Investors relying on gifted or borrowed funds must demonstrate the lawful source of those funds by submitting the evidence described above for the donor or, if not a bank, the lender.[61]

5. Targeted Employment Area

A TEA is a rural area or an area that has experienced high unemployment.[62] A rural area is any area other than an area within a standard metropolitan statistical area (MSA) (as designated by the Office of Management and Budget) or within the outer boundary of any city or town having a population of 20,000 or more based on the most recent decennial census of the United States.[63] For petitions filed before March 15, 2022, a high unemployment area is an area that has experienced unemployment of at least 150 percent of the national average rate.[64] For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, a high unemployment area is an area designated as such by the Secretary of Homeland Security under INA 203(b)(5)(B)(ii).

Congress provided for a reduced investment amount in a TEA to encourage investment in new commercial enterprises principally doing business in and creating jobs in areas of greatest need. For the lower capital investment amount to apply, the new commercial enterprise into which the immigrant invests or the actual job-creating entity must be principally doing business in the TEA.

A new commercial enterprise is principally doing business in the location where it regularly, systematically, and continuously provides goods or services that support job creation. If the new commercial enterprise provides such goods or services in more than one location, it will be principally doing business in the location most significantly related to the job creation.

Factors considered in determining where a new commercial enterprise is principally doing business include, but are not limited to, the location of:

Investments through regional centers allow the immigrant investor to seek to establish indirect job creation. In these cases, the job-creating entity, rather than the new commercial enterprise, determines where the entity is principally doing business. The job-creating entity must be principally doing business in the TEA for the lower capital investment amount to apply.[66]

To demonstrate that the area of the investment is a TEA, the immigrant investor must demonstrate that the TEA meets the statutory and regulatory criteria by submitting:

To promote predictability in the capital investment process, an officer identifies the appropriate date to examine in order to determine whether the immigrant investor’s capital investment qualifies for the lower capital investment amount according to the following table:

Targeted Employment Area Analysis
Petition Filing Timeframe TEA Analysis
Petition filed on or after March 15, 2022 USCIS designates TEAs based on the Immigrant Petition by Standalone Investor (Form I-526) filing for standalone petitions and as part of the Application for Approval of an Investment in a Commercial Enterprise (I-956F), for regional center-affiliated projects.[74]
Petitions filed before March 15, 2022, and standalone petitions[75] filed on or after March 15, 2022
  • If the investment of capital is made into the new commercial enterprise, and made available to the job-creating entity in the case of investment through a regional center, before the filing of the Form I-526, then the TEA analysis should focus on whether the area in which the new commercial enterprise, or job-creating entity in the case of investment through a regional center, is principally doing business qualifies as a TEA at the time of the investment.
  • If the investment of capital has yet to be made into the new commercial enterprise, or made available to the job-creating entity in the case of investment through a regional center, at the time of the Form I-526 petition filing, then the TEA analysis should focus on whether the area in which the new commercial enterprise, or job-creating entity in the case of investment through a regional center, is principally doing business qualifies as a TEA at the time of the filing of the Form I-526 petition.

A geographic area that once qualified as a TEA may no longer qualify as employment rates or population increase over time. Immigrant investors occasionally request eligibility for the reduced investment threshold based on the fact that other immigrant investors who previously invested in the same new commercial enterprise qualified for the lower capital investment amount. The immigrant investor must establish, however, that at the time of investment or at the time of filing the immigrant petition, as applicable, the geographic area in question qualified as a TEA. An immigrant investor cannot rely on previous TEA determinations made based on facts that have subsequently changed.

For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, USCIS designations of TEAs are valid for 2 years from the date of investment for standalone investors or 2 years from the date a regional center properly files the Form I-956F for regional center investors and may be renewed for one or more 2-year periods.[76] An immigrant investor who has invested the amount of capital required for a TEA during an approved designation does not have to increase their investment if the designation expires.[77]

The area in question may qualify as a TEA at the time the investment is made or the Form I-526 immigrant petition is filed, whichever occurs first, but may cease to qualify by the time the Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status (Form I-829) is filed. The investor is not required to demonstrate that the area in question remains a TEA at the time the Form I-829 petition is filed. Changes in population size or unemployment rates within the area during the period of conditional permanent residence are acceptable, since increased job creation is a primary goal, which has been met if the area was a TEA at the time the investment was made, or the Form I-526 was filed.

A State’s Designation of a Targeted Employment Area Before March 15, 2022

For petitions filed before March 15, 2022, a state government could designate a geographic or political subdivision within its boundaries as a TEA based on high unemployment. Before the state could make such a designation, an official of the state must have notified USCIS of the agency, board, or other appropriate state governmental body that would be delegated the authority to certify that the geographic or political subdivision was a high unemployment area.[78] The state was then able to send a letter from the authorized body of the state certifying that the geographic or political subdivision of the MSA or of the city or town with a population of 20,000 or more in which the enterprise is principally doing business had been designated a high unemployment area.[79]

Consistent with the regulations in effect before March 15, 2022, USCIS deferred to state determinations of the appropriate boundaries of a geographic or political subdivision that constitutes the TEA. However, for all TEA designations, USCIS still ensured compliance with the statutory requirement that the proposed area designated by the state had an unemployment rate of at least 150 percent above the national average. To do this, USCIS reviewed state determinations of the unemployment rate and assessed the method or methods by which the state authority obtained the unemployment statistics.

Acceptable data sources for calculating unemployment included U.S. Census Bureau data (including data from the American Community Survey) and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (including data from Local Area Unemployment Statistics).

There has never been a provision allowing a state to designate a rural area.

6. Infrastructure Projects

For regional center-based petitions filed on or after May 14, 2022, investors may qualify for the reduced investment amount by investing in an infrastructure project. These projects are ones:

USCIS determines whether a project meets the definition of infrastructure project during adjudication of the Form I-956F.[81] A standalone investor cannot establish eligibility through an infrastructure project.

B. Comprehensive Business Plan

For standalone investor petitions filed at any time and regional center investor petitions filed before March 15, 2022, a comprehensive business plan should contain, at a minimum, a description of the business, its products or services (or both), and its objectives.[82]

The plan should contain a market analysis, including the names of competing businesses and their relative strengths and weaknesses, a comparison of the competition’s products and pricing structures, and a description of the target market and prospective customers of the new commercial enterprise. The plan should list the required permits and licenses obtained. If applicable, it should describe the manufacturing or production process, the materials required, and the supply sources.

The plan should detail any contracts executed for the supply of materials or the distribution of products. It should discuss the marketing strategy of the business, including pricing, advertising, and servicing. The plan should set forth the business’s organizational structure and its personnel’s experience. It should explain the business’s staffing requirements and contain a timetable for hiring, as well as job descriptions for all positions. It should contain sales, costs, and income projections and detail the basis of such projections.

Most importantly, the business plan must be credible.[83]

USCIS reviews business plans in their totality. An officer must determine if it is more likely than not that the business plan is comprehensive and credible. A business plan is not required to contain all of the detailed elements, but the more details the business plan contains, the more likely it is that USCIS considers the plan comprehensive and credible.[84]

As of May 14, 2022, regional centers file a Form I-956F before investors file their Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor (Form I-526E).[85]

C. New Commercial Enterprise

A new commercial enterprise is any commercial enterprise established after November 29, 1990.[86] Therefore, the immigrant investor can invest the required amount of capital in a commercial enterprise established after November 29, 1990, provided the remaining eligibility criteria are met.

The following table outlines the definition of new commercial enterprise, depending on when the petition was filed.

Petitions filed before March 15, 2022 Petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022

A commercial enterprise is any for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of lawful business.[87] This broad definition is consistent with the realities of the business world and the many different forms and structures that job-creating activities can have.

Types of commercial enterprises include, but are not limited to:

  • Sole proprietorship;
  • Partnership (whether limited or general);
  • Holding company;
  • Joint venture;
  • Corporation;
  • Business trust; or
  • Other entity, which may be publicly or privately owned.[88]

A commercial enterprise can consist of a holding company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, provided that each such subsidiary is engaged in a for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of a lawful business. Noncommercial activities, including owning and operating a personal residence, do not qualify.[89]

The commercial enterprise must be formed to make a profit, unlike, for example, some charitable organizations.

 The term new commercial enterprise means any for-profit organization formed in the United States for the ongoing conduct of lawful business, including sole proprietorship, partnership (whether limited or general), holding company and its wholly owned subsidiaries (provided that each subsidiary is engaged in a for-profit activity formed for the ongoing conduct of a lawful business), joint venture, corporation, business trust, limited liability company, or other entity (which may be publicly or privately owned) that receives, or is established to receive, capital investment from immigrant investors.[90]

The Business Structures (PDF, 415.56 KB) overview provides more information on the most common business forms or structures, including information on formation, fundamental characteristics, and the tax forms submitted to the Internal Revenue Service.

1. Enterprise Established on or before November 29, 1990

A new commercial enterprise also includes a commercial enterprise established on or before November 29, 1990, if the enterprise will be restructured or expanded through the immigrant’s investment of capital.

Purchase of an Existing Business that is Restructured or Reorganized

The immigrant investor can invest in a business that existed on or before November 29, 1990, provided that the existing business is simultaneously or subsequently restructured or reorganized such that a new commercial enterprise results.[91] Cosmetic changes to the décor, a new marketing strategy, or a simple change in ownership do not qualify as restructuring.[92]

However, a business plan that modifies an existing business, such as converting a restaurant into a nightclub or adding substantial crop production to an existing livestock farm, could qualify as a restructuring or reorganization.

Expansion of an Existing Business

The immigrant investor can invest in a business that existed on or before November 29, 1990, provided a substantial change in the net worth or number of employees results from the investment of capital.[93]

Substantial change is defined as a 40 percent increase either in the net worth or in the number of employees, so that the new net worth or number of employees amounts to at least 140 percent of the pre-expansion net worth or number of employees.[94]

Investment in a new commercial enterprise in this manner does not exempt the immigrant investor from meeting the requirements relating to the amount of capital that must be invested and the number of jobs that must be created.[95]

2. Pooled Investments in Original EB-5 Program

For petitions filed before March 15, 2022, a new commercial enterprise may be used as the basis for the petitions of more than one standalone immigrant investor. For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, pooled investments with more than one EB-5 investor are only permitted under the regional center program.[96] For petitions filed before March 15, 2022, each standalone immigrant investor must invest the required amount of capital and each immigrant investor’s investment must result in the required number of jobs. Furthermore, the new commercial enterprise can have owners who are not immigrant investors provided that the sources of all capital invested are identified and all invested capital has been derived by lawful means.[97]

3. Documentation of New Commercial Enterprise

Except for petitions filed by regional center investors on or after May 14, 2022,[98] to document the new commercial enterprise, the immigrant investor must present the following evidence, in addition to any other evidence that USCIS deems appropriate:

This evidence must be in the form of stock purchase agreements, investment agreements, certified financial reports, payroll records, or any similar instruments, agreements, or documents evidencing the investment in the commercial enterprise and the resulting substantial change in the net worth or number of employees.[99]

4. Investment in New Commercial Enterprise

To show that the immigrant investor has committed the required amount of capital to the new commercial enterprise, the evidence presented may include, but is not limited to, the following:

5. Engagement in Management of New Commercial Enterprise

The immigrant investor must be engaged in the management of the new commercial enterprise, either through the exercise of day-to-day managerial responsibility or through policy formulation.[101]

To show that the immigrant investor is or will be engaged in the exercise of day-to-day managerial control or policy formulation, the immigrant investor must submit:

D. Creation of Jobs

The creation of jobs for U.S. workers is a critical element of the EB-5 category. It is not enough that the immigrant investor invests funds into the U.S. economy. The investment of the required amount of capital must be in a new commercial enterprise that creates[105] at least 10 jobs for qualifying employees. It is important to recognize that while the investment must result in the creation of jobs for qualifying employees, it is the new commercial enterprise that creates the jobs.[106]

Example: Standalone Investments Before March 15, 2022

Ten standalone immigrant investors seek to establish a hotel as their new commercial enterprise. The establishment of the new hotel requires capital to pay financing costs to unrelated third parties, purchase the land, develop the plans, obtain the licenses, build the structure, maintain the grounds, staff the hotel, as well as many other types of expenses involved in the development and operation of a new hotel.

The standalone immigrant investor’s capital can be used to pay part or all of these expenses. Each standalone immigrant investor’s investment of capital helps the new commercial enterprise (the new hotel) create 10 jobs. The 10 immigrants’ investments must result in the new hotel’s creation of 100 jobs (10 jobs for each investor’s capital investment) for qualifying employees.[107]

1. Bridge Financing

A developer or principal of a new commercial enterprise, either directly or through a separate job-creating entity, may use interim, temporary, or bridge financing, in the form of either debt or equity, prior to receipt of immigrant investor capital. If the project starts based on the interim or bridge financing prior to receiving immigrant investor capital and subsequently replaces that financing with immigrant investor capital, the new commercial enterprise may still receive credit for the job creation under the regulations.

Generally, the replacement of temporary or bridge financing with immigrant investor capital should have been contemplated prior to acquiring the original temporary financing. However, even if the immigrant investor financing was not contemplated prior to acquiring the temporary financing, as long as the financing to be replaced was contemplated as short-term temporary financing that would be subsequently replaced by more permanent long-term financing, the infusion of immigrant investor financing could still result in the creation of, and credit for, new jobs.

For example, if traditional financing originally contemplated to replace the temporary financing is no longer available to the commercial enterprise, a developer is not precluded from using immigrant investor capital as an alternative source. Immigrant investor capital may replace temporary financing even if this arrangement was not contemplated prior to obtaining the bridge or temporary financing.

The full amount of the immigrant’s investment must be made available to the business or businesses most closely responsible for creating the jobs upon which eligibility is based. In the regional center context if the new commercial enterprise is not the job-creating entity, then the full amount of the capital must be invested first in the new commercial enterprise and then made available to the job-creating entity or entities.[108]

2. Multiple Job-Creating Entities

If invested in a single new commercial enterprise and where the offering and organizational documents provide, an investor’s full investment may be distributed to more than one job-creating entity in a portfolio investment strategy. The record must demonstrate that the new commercial enterprise will create the requisite jobs through the portfolio of projects. In addition, each investor (or regional center for regional center-based petitions filed on or after May 14, 2022) must demonstrate that the full amount of money is made available to the business(es) most closely responsible for creating the employment upon which the petition is based, which may be one or multiple job-creating entities in a portfolio.

3. Full-Time Positions for Qualifying Employees

The investment into a new commercial enterprise must create full-time positions for not fewer than 10 qualifying employees.[109] An employee is defined as a person who provides services or labor for the new commercial enterprise and who receives wages or other remuneration directly from the new commercial enterprise. In the case of the Regional Center Program, an employee also means a person who provides services or labor in a job that has been created indirectly through investment in the new commercial enterprise.[110]

Qualifying Employee

For the purpose of the job creation requirement, the employee must be a qualifying employee. A qualifying employee is a U.S. citizen, a lawfully admitted permanent resident, or other immigrant lawfully authorized for employment in the United States including, but not limited to, a conditional resident, a temporary resident, an asylee, a refugee, or a noncitizen remaining in the United States under suspension of deportation. This definition does not include the immigrant investor, the immigrant investor’s spouse, sons, daughters, or any nonimmigrant.[111]

Full-Time Employment

For the purpose of the job creation requirement, the position must be a full-time employment position.[112] Full-time employment is defined as employment of a qualifying employee by the new commercial enterprise in a position that requires a minimum of 35 working hours per week.[113] In the case of the Regional Center Program, full-time employment also means employment of a qualifying employee in a position that has been created indirectly that requires a minimum of 35 working hours per week.

Two or more qualifying employees can fill a full-time employment position in a job-sharing arrangement. Job sharing is permissible so long as the 35 working hours per week requirement is met. However, the definition of full-time employment does not include combinations of part-time positions, even if those positions when combined meet the hourly requirement per week.[114]

A job-sharing arrangement whereby two or more qualifying employees share a full-time position counts as full-time employment provided the hourly requirement per week is met. To demonstrate that a full-time position is shared by more than one employee, the following evidence, among others, may be relevant:

Jobs that are intermittent, temporary, seasonal, or transient in nature do not qualify as permanent full-time jobs. However, jobs that are expected to last at least 2 years are generally not considered intermittent, temporary, seasonal, or transient in nature.

4. Measuring Job Creation

The immigrant investor seeking to enter the United States through the EB-5 program must invest the required amount of capital in a new commercial enterprise that will create full-time positions for at least 10 qualifying employees. There are three methods of measuring job creation depending on the new commercial enterprise and where it is located.

Troubled Business

The U.S. economy benefits when the immigrant investor’s capital helps preserve the troubled business’s existing jobs. Immigrant investors investing in a new commercial enterprise that is a troubled business, must show that the number of existing employees in the troubled business is being, or will be, maintained at no less than the pre-investment level for a period of at least 2 years.[115] This applies in the regional center context as well.

The troubled business regulatory provision does not decrease the number of jobs required. An immigrant investor who invests in a troubled business must still demonstrate that 10 jobs have been preserved, created, or some combination of the two. For example, an investment in a troubled business that creates four qualifying jobs and preserves all six pre-investment jobs would satisfy the job creation requirement.

The regulatory definition of a troubled business is a business that has:

For purposes of determining whether or not the troubled business has been in existence for 2 years, USCIS deems the successors-in-interest to the troubled business to have been in existence for the same period of time as the business they succeeded.[117]

New Commercial Enterprise Not Located Within a Regional Center

For a new commercial enterprise not located within a regional center, the full-time positions must be created directly by the new commercial enterprise to be counted. This means that the new commercial enterprise (or its wholly owned subsidiaries) must itself be the employer of the qualifying employees.[118]

New Commercial Enterprise Located Within a Regional Center

For regional center-based petitions filed before July 1, 2021, the date that the previous authorization of the regional center program lapsed, full-time positions can be created either directly or indirectly by a new commercial enterprise located within a designated regional center.[119] For regional center-based petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, up to 90 percent of full-time positions may be created indirectly.[120] The general EB-5 program requirements still apply to investors investing in new commercial enterprises in the regional center context except that they may rely on indirect job creation. Employees filling indirect jobs do not work directly for the new commercial enterprise. Immigrant investors must use reasonable methodologies to establish the number of indirect jobs created.[121]

Direct jobs are those jobs that establish an employer-employee relationship between the new commercial enterprise and the persons it employs. For regional center-based petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, direct jobs that count towards the requisite 10 percent of jobs include direct employees, including those estimated by economically and statistically valid methodologies, of both the new commercial enterprise and the job creating entity.[122]

Indirect jobs are those that are held outside of the new commercial enterprise but are created as a result of the new commercial enterprise. For example, indirect jobs can include, but are not limited to, those held by employees of the job-creating entity (when the job-creating entity is not the new commercial enterprise) as well as employees of producers of materials, equipment, or services used by the new commercial enterprise or job-creating entity.

In addition, a sub-set of indirect jobs, known as induced jobs, are created when the new direct and indirect employees spend their earnings on consumer goods and services. Indirect jobs can qualify and be counted as jobs attributable to a new commercial enterprise associated with a regional center, based on reasonable methodologies, even if the jobs are located outside of the geographic boundaries of a regional center.

For petitions filed on or after May 15, 2022, Congress enacted certain limits on how jobs created by construction activity lasting less than 2 years can count towards estimated indirect and direct jobs.[123]

Due to the nature of accepted job creation modeling practices, USCIS relies upon reasonable economic models to determine that it is more likely than not that the indirect jobs are created. USCIS may request additional evidence that the indirect jobs created, or to be created, are full-time. USCIS may also request additional evidence to verify that the direct jobs (those held at the new commercial enterprise) will be or are full-time and permanent, which may include a review of W-2 forms or similar evidence.

Multiple Investors

For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, pooled investments with more than one EB-5 investor are only permitted under the regional center program.[124] For petitions filed before March 15, 2022, and all regional center-based petitions, when there are multiple investors in a new commercial enterprise, USCIS allocates the total number of full-time positions created for qualifying employees only to those immigrant investors who have used the establishment of the new commercial enterprise as the basis for their immigrant petition. An allocation does not need to be made among persons not seeking classification through the EB-5 category. Also, jobs need not be allocated to non-natural persons, such as corporations investing in a new commercial enterprise.[125] USCIS allocates full-time positions to immigrant investors based on the date their petition to remove conditions was filed, unless otherwise stated in the relevant documents.[126]

In general, multiple immigrant investors may not claim credit for the same job. An immigrant investor may not seek credit for the same specifically identified job position that has already been allocated to another immigrant investor in a previously approved case.

5. Evidence of Job Creation

To show that a new commercial enterprise will create no fewer than 10 full-time positions for qualifying employees, and except as provided below for regional center-based petitions filed on or after May 14, 2022, an immigrant investor must submit the following evidence:

The 2-year period[128] is deemed to begin 6 months after adjudication of Form I-526. The business plan filed with the immigrant petition should reasonably demonstrate that the requisite number of jobs will be created by the end of this 2-year period.

Troubled Business

In the case of a troubled business, a comprehensive business plan must accompany the other required evidentiary documents.[129]

Regional Center-Based Petitions Filed before July 1, 2021

In the case of a new commercial enterprise within a regional center, the direct or indirect job creation may be demonstrated by the types of documents identified in this section along with reasonable methodologies.[130] If a regional center immigrant investor seeks to rely on jobs that will be created to satisfy the job creation requirement, a comprehensive business plan is required.

Additionally, if the regional center immigrant investor seeks to demonstrate job creation through the use of an economic input-output model, USCIS requires the investor to demonstrate that the methodology is reasonable. For example, if the inputs into the input-output model reflect jobs created directly at the new commercial enterprise or job-creating entity, USCIS requires the investor to demonstrate that the direct jobs input is reasonable. Relevant documentation may include Form I-9, tax or payroll records or if the jobs are not yet in existence, a comprehensive business plan demonstrating how many jobs will be created and when the jobs will be created.

If the inputs into the model reflect expenditures, USCIS requires the investor to demonstrate that the expenditures input is reasonable. Relevant documentation may include receipts and other financial records for expenditures that have occurred and a detailed projection of sales, costs, and income projections such as a pro-forma cash flow statement associated with the business plan for expenditures that will occur.

If the inputs into the model reflect revenues, USCIS requires the investor to demonstrate that the revenues input is reasonable. Relevant documentation may include tax or other financial records for revenues that have occurred or a detailed projection of sales, costs, and income projections such as a pro-forma income statement associated with the business plan for revenues that will occur.

In reviewing whether an economic methodology is reasonable, USCIS analyzes whether the multipliers and assumptions about the geographic impact of the project are reasonable. For example, when reviewing the geographic level of the multipliers used in an input-output model, the following factors, among others, may be considered:

Regional Center-Based Petitions Filed on or after May 14, 2022

As of May 14, 2022, regional centers file a Form I-965F with USCIS before a regional center investor may file an individual petition.

6. Guidance on Tenant Occupancy Methodology

As of May 15, 2018, USCIS rescinded its prior guidance on tenant occupancy methodology. That update applies to all USCIS employees with respect to determinations of all the former Immigrant Petitions by Alien Investors (Form I-526),[131] Petitions by Investors to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status (Form I-829), and the former Applications for Regional Center Designation Under the Immigrant Investor Program (Form I-924) filed on or after that date and prior to March 15, 2022.[132] USCIS also gives deference to Form I-526 and Form I-829 petitions directly related to projects approved before May 15, 2018, absent material change, fraud or misrepresentation, or legal deficiency of the prior determination.[133]

Previously, on December 20, 2012, USCIS had issued policy guidance defining the criteria to be used in the adjudication of applications and petitions relying on tenant occupancy to establish indirect jobs.[134] In November 2016, USCIS published consolidated policy guidance on immigrant investors in this Policy Manual, including guidance on the tenant occupancy methodology. That guidance provided that investors could (1) map a specific amount of direct, imputed, or subsidized investment to new jobs, or (2) use a facilitation-based approach to demonstrate the project would remove a significant market-based constraint.

The first method requires mapping a specific amount of direct, imputed, or subsidized investment to new jobs such that there is an equity or direct financial connection between the EB-5 capital investment and the employees of prospective tenants. In practice, however, the construction of standard office or retail space alone does not lead to a sufficient connection for this type of mapping such that tenant jobs can be credited to the new commercial enterprise. The existence of numerous other factors, such as the identity of future tenants and demand for that type of business, makes it difficult to relate individual jobs to a specific space.

The second method looks at whether the investment removes a significant market-based constraint, referred to in the 2012 guidance as the “facilitation based approach.” In providing this approach as an option, USCIS explicitly allowed applicants and petitioners to avoid having to establish an equity or direct financial connection between the EB-5 capital investment and the employees of prospective tenants. As of May 15, 2018, however, USCIS determined that that allowance was ill-advised, because a direct financial connection between the EB-5 capital investment and the job creation is necessary to determine a sufficient nexus between the two. Reliance on a showing of constraint on supply or excess of demand by itself does not establish a causal link between specific space and a net new labor demand such that it would overcome the lack of a sufficient nexus.

Moreover, allowing applicants and petitioners to use prospective tenant jobs as direct inputs into regional growth models to generate the number of indirect and induced jobs that result from the credited tenant jobs leads to a more attenuated and less verifiable connection to the investment. There is also no reasonable test to confirm that jobs claimed through either tenant-occupancy methodology are new rather than relocated jobs such that they should qualify as direct inputs in the first place.

In sum, tenant-occupancy methodologies described in the 2012 Operational Guidance and previously incorporated into the Policy Manual result in a connection or nexus between the investment and jobs that is too tenuous[135] and therefore are no longer considered reasonable methodologies or valid forecasting tools under the regulations.[136]

As of May 14, 2022, regional center petitioners may include jobs estimated to be created under a methodology that attributes jobs to prospective tenants occupying commercial real estate created or improved by capital investments if the number of such jobs estimated to be created has been determined by an economically and statistically valid methodology and such jobs are not existing jobs that have been relocated.[137]

E. Burden of Proof

The petitioner or applicant must establish each element by a preponderance of the evidence.[138] The petitioner or applicant does not need to remove all doubt. Even if an officer has some doubt as to the truth, if the petitioner or applicant submits relevant, probative, and credible evidence that leads to the conclusion that the claim is more likely than not (that is, probably true), the petitioner or applicant has satisfied the preponderance of evidence standard.

F. Priority Dates

A priority date is the date the completed, signed petition is properly filed with USCIS.[139]

If an immigrant investor files an amended Form I-526E in the case of termination or debarment of the petitioner’s regional center, new commercial enterprise, or job-creating entity, the petitioner may use the priority date of their original petition for purposes of the amended Form I-526E filed on or after May 15, 2022, for which the petitioner qualifies.[140]

Footnotes

[^ 1] The effective date for the newly codified regional center program is 60 days after the March 15, 2022, enactment date. See Section 103(b)(2) of the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022, Div. BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022, Pub. L. 117-103 (PDF), 136 Stat. 49 (March 15, 2022).

[^ 2] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF). DHS published the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization Rule, effective November 21, 2019. See 84 FR 35750 (PDF), 35808 (July 24, 2019). However, that rule was vacated by Behring Regional Center LLC v. Wolf, 544 F. Supp. 3d 937 (N.D. Cal. 2021). Therefore, all links to regulations in this chapter are to those in effect prior to that rule.

[^ 3] The effective date for the newly codified regional center program is 60 days after the March 15, 2022, enactment date. See Section 103(b)(2) of the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022, Div. BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022, Pub. L. 117-103, 136 Stat. 49 (March 15, 2022).

[^ 4] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 5] See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(ii).

[^ 6] See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(ii).

[^ 7] SeeMatter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 8] See S. Rep. No. 101-55 (1989). See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF). See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(ii) and INA 203(b)(5)(L). For more discussion of lawful source of funds requirements, see Subsection 4, Lawful Source of Funds [6 USCIS-PM G.2(A)(4)].

[^ 9] See INA 203(b)(5)(L)(iii). For more discussion of gifts and loans, see Subsection 4, Lawful Source of Funds [6 USCIS-PM G.2(A)(4)].

[^ 10] Perfecting a security interest relates to the additional steps required to make a security interest effective against third parties or to retain its effectiveness in the event of default by the grantor of the security interest.

[^ 11] See Matter of Hsiung (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 201, 202 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 12] See Matter of Hsiung (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 201, 202-03 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 13] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 193-94 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 14] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF). USCIS no longer follows its interpretation of indebtedness as including the investment of loan proceeds as of November 30, 2018, the date of the district court decision Zhang v. USCIS, 978 F.3d 1314 (D.C. Cir. 2020).

[^ 15] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 195 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 16] See INA 203(b)(5)(A)(i).

[^ 17] See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(ii)(III)(bb). See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 18] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(2) (PDF).

[^ 19] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 180-188 (Assoc. Comm. 1998). For petitions filed on or after March 15, 2022, INA 203(b)(5)(D)(ii)(III)(cc) also applies.

[^ 20] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 184 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 21] The full definition of invest is provided at 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 22] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 183-188 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 23] EB-5 regulations contain two basic requirements in order to have a legitimate qualifying investment: (1) 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF) defines “invest” to require a qualifying (that is, non-prohibited) contribution of capital; and (2) 8 CFR 204.6(j)(2) (PDF) requires a qualifying use of such capital (placing such capital at risk for the purpose of generating a return). In order to satisfy the evidentiary requirement set forth at 8 CFR 204.6(j)(2) (PDF), an investor must first properly contribute capital in accordance with the definition of invest at 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF). If the contribution of capital fails to meet the definition of invest, it is not a qualifying investment, even if it is at risk for the purpose of generating a return.

[^ 24] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 186-187 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 25] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 188 (Assoc. Comm. 1998). Matter of Izummi (PDF) addressed redemption agreements in general, and not only those where the investor holds the right to repayment. USCIS generally disfavors redemption provisions that indicate a preconceived intent to exit the investment as soon as possible, and notes that one district court has drawn the line at whether the investor holds the right to repayment. See Chang v. USCIS, 289 F. Supp.3d 177 (D.D.C. Feb. 7, 2018).

[^ 26] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169 (185-86) (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 27] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 188 (Assoc. Comm. 1998). See Chang v. USCIS, 289 F. Supp.3d 177 (D.D.C. Feb. 7, 2018).

[^ 28] See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(ii)(III).

[^ 29] See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(ii)(IV).

[^ 30] See Matter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206, 209-210 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 31] See Matter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206, 210 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 32] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N 169, 179, 189 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 33] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 178-79 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 34] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(2) (PDF).

[^ 35] SeeMatter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206, 210 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 36] When funds are held in escrow outside the United States, USCIS reviews currency exchange rates at the time of adjudicating the Form I-526 petition to determine if it is more likely than not that the petitioner will make the minimum qualifying capital investment. With the Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status (Form I-829), USCIS reviews the evidence in the record, including currency exchange rates at the time of transfer, to determine that, when the funds were actually transferred to the United States, the petitioner actually made the minimum qualifying capital investment.

[^ 37] See Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status (Form I-829).

[^ 38] See Matter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206, 209-210 (Assoc. Comm. 1998). See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 179, 189 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 39] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 40] Based on an internal review and analysis of typical EB-5 capital deployment structures, USCIS generally considers 12 months to be a reasonable amount of time to further deploy capital for most types of commercial enterprises but considers evidence showing that a longer period is reasonable for a specific type of commercial enterprise or into a specific commercial activity under the totality of the circumstances.

[^ 41] The requirement to make the full amount of capital available to the business(es) most closely responsible for creating the employment upon which the petition is based is generally satisfied through the initial deployment of capital resulting in the creation of the required number of jobs.

[^ 42] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF) for the definition of commercial enterprise.

[^ 43] This clarification is meant to address potential confusion among stakeholders regarding prior language about the “scope” of the new commercial enterprise while remaining consistent with applicable eligibility requirements.

[^ 44] See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(1). See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 175-6, 189 (Assoc. Comm. 1998). See Chapter 3, Immigrant Petition Adjudication, Section C, Material Change [6 USCIS-PM G.3(C)].

[^ 45] See INA 203(b)(5)(A), which refers to a single new commercial enterprise: “Visas shall be made available . . . to qualified immigrants seeking to enter the United States for the purpose of engaging in a new commercial enterprise.”

[^ 46] See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(iv) and INA 203(b)(5)(E)(v).

[^ 47] See INA 203(b)(5)(F)(v).

[^ 48] In a rule effective November 21, 2019, DHS raised the investment amounts to $1,800,000 and $900,000. See 84 FR 35750, 35808 (PDF) (July 24, 2019). On June 22, 2019, however, a federal court vacated that rule. See Behring Regional Center LLC v. Wolf, 544 F. Supp. 3d 937 (N.D. Cal. 2021). Therefore, all petitions filed before March 15, 2022, are subject to the original investment amounts set in 1990.

[^ 49] See INA 203(b)(5)(C).

[^ 50] The full amount of money must be made available to the business(es) most closely responsible for creating the employment upon which the petition is based. See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 179 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 51] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 52] The effective date for the new lawful source of funds provisions outlined in the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 is 60 days after the Act’s March 15, 2022, enactment date. See Section 103(b)(2) of Div. BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022, Pub. L. 117-103, 136 Stat. 49 (March 15, 2022).

[^ 53] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(3) (PDF). See Matter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206, 210-11 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 54] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 55] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF) and 8 CFR 204.6(j)(3) (PDF).

[^ 56] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(3) (PDF).

[^ 57] As required under 8 CFR 204.6(j)(3)(ii) (PDF).

[^ 58] The effective date for these provisions outlined in the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 is 60 days after the Act’s March 15, 2022, enactment date. See Section 103(b)(2) of Div. BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of, 2022, Pub. L. 117-103, 136 Stat. 49 (March 15, 2022).

[^ 59] See INA 203(b)(5)(L).

[^ 60] See INA 203(b)(5)(L)(iii)(I).

[^ 61] See INA 203(b)(5)(L)(iii)(II).

[^ 62] See INA 203(b)(5)(B)(ii) (prior to March 15, 2022). See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(viii).

[^ 63] See INA 203(b)(5)(B)(ii) (prior to March 15, 2022) and INA 203(b)(5)(D)(vii). See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 64] See INA 203(b)(5)(B)(ii) (prior to March 15, 2022). See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 65] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 174 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 66] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6) (PDF). See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 171-73 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 67] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6)(i) (PDF).

[^ 68] In a rule effective November 21, 2019, DHS eliminated the ability for states to designate TEAs and set rules for how USCIS would make those determinations. See 84 FR 35750, 35808 (PDF) (July 24, 2019). On June 22, 2019, however, a federal court vacated that rule. See Behring Regional Center LLC v. Wolf, 544 F. Supp. 3d (N.D. Cal. 2021). Therefore, all petitions filed before March 15, 2022, are subject to the previous rules on TEAs and may rely on state designations.

[^ 69] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6)(ii)(B) (PDF).

[^ 70] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6)(ii)(A) (PDF).

[^ 71] USCIS makes designations as part of the standalone petition adjudication. See INA 203(b)(5)(B)(ii). USCIS makes designations for regional center filings on or after May 14, 2022, as part of the Form I-956F adjudication. See INA 203(b)(5)(F). USCIS does not issue separate designation notices.

[^ 72] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6)(i) (PDF) and 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6)(ii)(B) (PDF).

[^ 73] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6)(i) (PDF).

[^ 74] See INA 203(b)(5)(F)(i) and INA 204(a)(1)(H)(i) requiring the filing of a Form I-956F before an investor in that offering can file a petition for classification.

[^ 75] For regional center petitions filed after May 14, 2022, USCIS makes the TEA determination at the project application stage and designations are valid for 2 years. See INA 203(b)(5)(B)(ii).

[^ 76] See INA 203(b)(5)(B)(ii)(IV).

[^ 77] See INA 203(b)(5)(B)(ii)(V).

[^ 78] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6)(i) (PDF).

[^ 79] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(6)(ii)(B) (PDF).

[^ 80] See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(iv).

[^ 81] See INA 203(b)(5)(B)(iii)(I).

[^ 82] See Matter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206, 213 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 83] See Matter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206, 213 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 84] See Matter of Ho (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 206, 213 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 85] See INA 203(b)(5)(F).

[^ 86] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 87] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 88] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 89] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 90] See INA 203(b)(5)(D)(vi).

[^ 91] See 8 CFR 204.6(h)(2) (PDF).

[^ 92] See Matter of Soffici (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 158 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 93] See 8 CFR 204.6(h)(3) (PDF).

[^ 94] See 8 CFR 204.6(h)(3) (PDF).

[^ 95] See 8 CFR 204.6(h)(3) (PDF).

[^ 96] See INA 204(a)(1)(H)(i).

[^ 97] See 8 CFR 204.6(g) (PDF).

[^ 98] For regional center-based petitions filed on or after May 14, 2022, USCIS reviews the new commercial enterprise as part of the Form I-965F for regional center-affiliated projects. See INA 203(b)(5)(F).

[^ 99] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(1) (PDF).

[^ 100] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(2)(i)-(v) (PDF).

[^ 101] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(5) (PDF).

[^ 102] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(5)(i) (PDF).

[^ 103] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(5)(i) (PDF).

[^ 104] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(5)(iii) (PDF).

[^ 105] Job maintenance is also permitted under certain circumstances. See Subsection 4, Measuring Job Creation [6 USCIS-PM G.2(D)(4)].

[^ 106] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(i) (PDF).

[^ 107] See 8 CFR 204.6(j) (PDF) (stating that it is the new commercial enterprise that must create the 10 jobs).

[^ 108] See Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 179 (Assoc. Comm. 1998).

[^ 109] See 8 CFR 204.6(j) (PDF).

[^ 110] See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(iv) and INA 203(b)(5)(E)(v). See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 111] See INA 203(b)(5)(A)(ii).

[^ 112] See INA 203(b)(5)(A)(ii).

[^ 113] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 114] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 115] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(ii) (PDF).

[^ 116] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(ii) (PDF).

[^ 117] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 118] See 8 CFR 204.6(e) (PDF).

[^ 119] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(iii) (PDF).

[^ 120] See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(iv)(I).

[^ 121] See 8 CFR 204.6(m)(1) (PDF) and 8 CFR 204.6(m)(7) (PDF). See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(v).

[^ 122] See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(iv)(I) and INA 203(b)(5)(E)(v).

[^ 123] See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(iv)(II) (limiting the percentage of estimated indirect jobs to 75 percent). See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(V)(II)(cc) (regarding the calculation of direct jobs).

[^ 124] See INA 204(a)(1)(H)(i).

[^ 125] See 8 CFR 204.6(g)(2) (PDF).

[^ 126] USCIS recognizes any reasonable agreement made among immigrant investors in regard to the identification and allocation of qualifying positions. See 8 CFR 204.6(g)(2) (PDF).

[^ 127] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(i) (PDF).

[^ 128] The 2-year period is described in 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(i)(B) (PDF).

[^ 129] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(ii) (PDF).

[^ 130] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(iii) (PDF).

[^ 131] In response to the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022, Division BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022, Pub. L. 117-103 (PDF), 136 Stat. 49, 1070 (March 15, 2022), USCIS bifurcated and renamed the Form I-526, resulting in the Immigrant Petition by Standalone Investor (Form I-526) and the Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor (Form I-526E).

[^ 132] See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(v)(II)(aa), allowing regional center investors to rely on relocated jobs.

[^ 133] See Chapter 3, Immigrant Petition Adjudication, Section A, Petitions Associated with Regional Centers, Subsection 2, Previous Determinations and Amendments [6 USCIS-PM G.3(A)(2)].

[^ 134] See Operational Guidance for EB-5 Cases Involving Tenant-Occupancy, GM-602-0001, issued December 20, 2012.

[^ 135] See, for example, Matter of Izummi (PDF), 22 I&N Dec. 169, 179 (Assoc. Comm. 1998) (holding that the full amount of the money must be made available to the business(es) most closely responsible for creating the employment on which the petition is based).

[^ 136] See 8 CFR 204.6(j)(4)(iii) (PDF) and 8 CFR 204.6(m)(3) (PDF).

[^ 137] See INA 203(b)(5)(E)(v)(II).

[^ 138] See Matter of Chawathe (PDF), 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375-376 (AAO 2010). For general information, see Volume 1, General Policies and Procedures, Part E, Adjudications, Chapter 4, Burden and Standards of Proof [1 USCIS-PM E.4].

[^ 139] See 8 CFR 204.6(d) (PDF).

[^ 140] See INA 203(b)(M)(v)(I). Priority date preservation was included in the EB-5 Modernization Rule, effective November 21, 2019. See 84 FR 35750, 35808 (PDF) (July 24, 2019). That rule, however, was vacated. See Behring Regional Center LLC v. Wolf, 544 F. Supp. 3d 937 (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Current as of January 24, 2024

Headquarters in LA, USA

Office Add.: 1598 Long Beach Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90813

Email: thlusa@gmail.com

Cellphone: +1 626-866-6888

Immigration Consultants in Shanghai, China:

Tivona Liu     Cellphone:13995525091    WeChat: Tivona_Liu    Email: tinilou@hotmail.com

Jessica Biao  Cellphone:18801621971    WeChat: K1580214698    Email: Jessicabqy@sina.com

CALIFORNIA INVESTMENT REGIONAL CENTER, LLC Copyright @2018-2025 WWW.EB5-CIRC.COM